ReviewJournal of ethnopharmacology2026
The continuing need for taxonomic input in phytochemical research.
Review in Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultivar to chemotype: characterizing complex botanicals with mass spectrometry metabolomics.Natural product reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ethnopharmacological relevanceCorrect taxonomic identification and depositing voucher herbarium specimens in an internationally recognized herbarium institution listed in the Index Herbariorum (https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/), such as the John G. Searle Herbarium of the Field Museum of Natural History (code: F), Chicago, in our case, are considered critical components and a requirement in phytochemical work. These specimens are not only important as a basis for proper taxonomic identification and as a future reference, but can also decide the fate of a research project. Despite this, numerous aberrations have been observed in the literature over several decades resulting in inconsistencies in the use of the correct plant names in natural products research papers. These include botanical misidentification, the lack of the involvement of a taxonomist when botanical products are purchased, and the lack of documenting the research by depositing herbarium vouchers in a recognized herbarium institution prior to their phytochemical investigation. AIM OF THE REVIEW: This short review attempts to point out the importance of a voucher herbarium specimen as the physical evidence of the correct taxonomic identification of the plant being studied, and the need to have voucher herbarium specimens of plants being investigated deposited in an internationally recognized herbarium institution, so that it may be retrieved whenever needed.
methodsIn addition to pointing out common errors found in the use of the correct plant scientific names in natural products research papers, a rationale is presented on the importance of documenting the plant investigated by voucher herbarium specimens and the use of correct taxonomic identification in natural product research papers.
resultsWhether in phytochemistry, food science, drug discovery or other relevant fields, correct botanical identification based on a voucher herbarium specimen is critical for successful research. Examples are presented on the practices of the two senior investigators of this review during their collaborative work for the past several decades, in following appropriate and correct taxonomic protocols in phytochemical research as part of the discovery of bioactive lead compounds as potential candidates for therapies against cancer and other diseases. One example is the case when voucher herbarium specimens dating back >60 years were used in identifying a species of Stevia as a source of the steviol glycoside class of sweeteners. Furthermore, the involvement of a taxonomic specialist in correcting the misidentification of the source plant of the potent rocaglate derivative, silvestrol (18), was shown to be of great value. This has led not only to the use of the correct name of the plant concerned but also enabled further work on the large-scale re-isolation and the more extensive biological testing of the prototype members of this class of antitumor and antiviral secondary metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.