ArticleChest2026
Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiography in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Article in Chest, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Omics Approaches in the Precision Management of Pulmonary Hypertension: From Early Diagnosis to Therapeutic Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reporting changes in right ventricular systolic pressure: insights from Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis.Echo research and practice · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence and mobile health in diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Review
- Personalized Medicine in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Death Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEchocardiography is central when assessing pulmonary hypertension (PH), but manual interpretation can be time-consuming and prone to error. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a fully automated deep learning (DL) workflow in echocardiography reliable when assessing PH? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis study had 2 parts: the first determined the bias and precision of DL reads by using Us2.ai software version 1.4.5 with core laboratory readers as the reference; the second part assessed the ability of DL to discriminate milder PH in patients referred for right heart catheterization (mean pulmonary artery pressure between 20 and 35 mm Hg). The first cohort (case-control) included 213 healthy individuals and 221 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Parameters included peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), right ventricular basal diameter, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right atrial area, and right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC). The referral cohort included 196 patients, with 171 patients having measurable peak TRV signals. Robust measures of bias and precision were reported, and area under the curve (AUC) analysis assessed discrimination.
resultsIn patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, mean age was 48 years, 78% were female, and mean pulmonary artery pressure was 52 mm Hg. No significant bias was observed for peak TRV (0.90%; 95% CI, -0.17 to 1.57), right atrial area (1.71%; 95% CI, 0.59 to 3.34), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (1.28%; 95% CI, -0.51 to 3.18), while RVFAC exhibited a significant bias of 11.46% (95% CI, 8.43 to 14.74). For all measurements except RVFAC, robust percentile precision remained below 15%. In the case-control cohort, peak TRV had AUCs of 0.99 and 0.98 for core laboratory and DL reads, respectively. The AUC for PH detection in the referral cohort was 0.79 for clinical laboratory reads and 0.75 for DL reads (P = .068).
interpretationA fully automated DL workflow for echocardiography in PH is promising and likely to improve efficiency in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.