ArticleParkinsonism & related disorders2025
Relationship between VMAT2-PET and DAT-SPECT caudate binding and Parkinson's disease cognitive decline.
Article in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dopamine-related alterations in functional brain network dynamic reconfiguration in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDopamine transporter (DAT) imaging can help diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD), and decreased caudate binding predicts cognitive decline. Studies suggest vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) imaging is more sensitive in detecting striatal changes associated with PD motor symptoms. Our hypothesis is that lower VMAT2 caudate binding is correlated with future cognitive decline in PD.
methodsWe utilized clinical and imaging data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). We evaluated the relationship between baseline VMAT2 and DAT caudate binding and future change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score using linear regression. To evaluate localization of findings we performed similar analysis with VMAT2 and DAT putamen and most and least affected caudate binding. We also categorized patients into groups of normal and reduced VMAT2 and DAT caudate binding and compared baseline and follow up characteristics between groups.
resultsAmong 54 subjects with follow up data, baseline VMAT2 caudate binding correlated with change in MoCA score, while DAT did not (r = 0.280, p = 0.0164 and r = 0.189, p = 0.410 respectively). Baseline VMAT2 putamen binding also correlated with change in MoCA score (p = 0.0236, r = 0.23). Reduced VMAT2 caudate binding groups had higher motor severity score at baseline and lower cognitive scores on follow-up (p = 0.0015), while DAT did not (p = 0.174). Patients with reduced VMAT2 caudate but not putamen binding had significantly greater decline in MoCA score (caudate p = 0.0015, putamen p = 0.179).
conclusionReduced caudate VMAT2 binding may predict future cognitive decline, and in our patient population, was more sensitive than caudate DAT binding in predicting the magnitude of decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.