ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
The recursive violence of reform: A century of failed interventions in migrant farmworker housing.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite extensive documentation and repeated reform efforts spanning more than a century, migrant farmworkers in the United States continue to face severe housing-related health inequities. Drawing on extensive archival research (1910-2024) and contemporary ethnographic fieldwork at labor camps on Maryland's Eastern Shore, we examine why interventions to improve farmworker housing conditions have consistently failed to create meaningful change and how different institutions have understood and responded to these conditions over time. Through systematic analysis of government documents, policy analyses, advocacy reports, media coverage, and ethnographic observations, we trace how housing conditions actively produce and maintain health inequities through their role in agricultural labor systems. Our findings reveal four recurring yet ineffective reform approaches: calls for improved standards, demands for enforcement, educational initiatives, and appeals for more research. We identify three structural factors that perpetuate these inequities: housing's function within racial capitalism, where spatial organization enables worker control and exploitation; the coordination between state policies and business interests through what we term the "Food Para-State," which systematically undermines reform efforts; and public health's role in accepting and furthering worker control, which normalizes inequities while expanding surveillance. The COVID-19 pandemic, during which agricultural workers faced infection rates four times higher than the general population, exemplifies how these structural factors transform housing conditions into mechanisms of health inequity. This analysis contributes to theories of structural determinants of health by demonstrating how housing conditions serve not merely as social determinants but as active mechanisms for producing and maintaining health inequities in agricultural labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.