Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40876060›Full record

ArticleFood and nutrition bulletin2025

A Global and Some National Perspectives on the Current Evidence of Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries.

Sonja Y Hess, Imelda Angeles-Agdeppa, Joyce Kinabo, Irene Medeme Mitchodigni, Renuka Silva, Manisha Tharaney, Fusta Azupogo, Lilia Bliznashka, Guy-Marino Hinnouho, Nadia Koyratty and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Food and nutrition bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonja Y HessInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4661-277X
Imelda Angeles-AgdeppaGlobal Institute of Professional Development and Excellence, Manila, The Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-9132-7399
Joyce KinaboDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition, and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-9143
Irene Medeme MitchodigniWorld Vegetable Center West and Central Africa, Cotonou, Benin.
Renuka SilvaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila, Sri Lanka.
Manisha TharaneyHealth and Nutrition Consultant, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7144-0519
Fusta AzupogoInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-0856
Lilia BliznashkaInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-1141
Guy-Marino HinnouhoICF, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-9702
Nadia KoyrattyInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6035-6920
Taryn J SmithDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9543-6461
Deanna K OlneyInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-8565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate amounts of fruit and vegetables (F&V) are an important part of a healthy diet, yet intake is suboptimal in most population groups worldwide. To better understand the evidence of strategies aiming to improve F&V intake, we conducted a scoping review of interventions assessing the impact on F&V intake, including those aiming to improve F&V intake explicitly and those targeting diet, health, lifestyle, or food environment generally. Among all eligible interventions reviewed, most of which were implemented in high-income countries, about half reported a significant positive impact on fruit and/or vegetable intake. Interventions that used a multicomponent strategy (61%) and those that focused on F&V specifically (72%) were most likely to find a significant increase in fruit and/or vegetable intake. Detailed summaries are provided in 2 accompanying articles. In the present article, we put these findings into perspective. Specifically, we considered the evidence for 4 target countries of the Fruit and Vegetables for Sustainable Healthy Diets Initiative: Benin, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania. When considering available evidence at the national level, there is a paucity of information from intervention trials despite evidence of inadequate F&V intakes in each of these countries. When considering available evidence at the global level, and especially for low-and-middle income countries, there is a critical need to strengthen the evidence across various intervention strategies, particularly related to targeting, timing, intensity, duration, frequency, and other key characteristics, to better understand how to enhance their impact on F&V intake in various population groups and contexts.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesDeveloping CountriesDiet, HealthyFruitHealth PromotionVegetablesDietHumansSri LankaTanzaniafruithigh-income countriesinterventionlow- and middle-income countriesvegetable

Identifiers

PMID40876060
PMCPMC12394765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.