ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning driven optimization of compressive strength of 3D printed bio polymer composite material.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic neural operator framework for multi-objective optimization of Ti-6Al-4 V metal matrix composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tri-domain prediction and optimization of nanocomposite polymers for high-performance 3D printing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Metal Additive Manufacturing: Applications in Design, Process Modeling, Monitoring, and Quality Optimization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Editorial Note: Machine learning driven optimization of compressive strength of 3D printed bio polymer composite material.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning based analysis of diesel engine performance using Fe₃O₄ nanoadditive in sterculia foetida biodiesel blend.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing has brought significant changes to manufacturing sectors, making it possible to produce intricate, multi-layered designs with greater ease. This study focuses on optimizing the compressive strength (CS) of functionally graded multi-material (PLA/Almond Shell Reinforced PLA) which is fabricated with the aid of the FFF process, a widely used additive manufacturing technique. Six different machine learning models (ML) were utilized to estimate CS using key process parameters, namely print speed (PS), layer height (LH), and printing temperature (PT). Among six ML models, Polynomial Regression (PR) performed best, with an R2 of 0.88 and the lowest error metrics (MAE = 1.38, RMSE = 1.9, MSE = 3.6). SHAP analysis indicated that PS is the most influential parameter, followed by LH. PR predicted optimal parameters (PS = 19 mm/s, LH = 0.1 mm, PT = 216°C) and yielded a predicted CS of 36 MPa, which was experimentally validated as 34.8 MPa with a low error of 3.44%. Also, the PR outperformed the traditional Taguchi method, which predicted a CS of 33.74 MPa, showing a 7.5% improvement and lower error. This demonstrates that PR-based ML optimization offers better accuracy and improved mechanical performance, making these FGMs suitable for various consumer applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.