Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The critical effects of self-management strategies on predicting cancer survivors' future quality of life and health status using machine learning techniques.

Ju Youn Jung, Young Ho Yun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ju Youn JungDivision of Tourism & Wellness, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Young Ho YunDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-7279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the significance of enhancing the quality of life (QoL) and overall health status (including physical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being) among individuals who have survived cancer, the existing prediction model for QoL and health status lacks sufficient interpretation. Our primary objectives were to develop and validate simple prediction models for QoL and secondary health statuses. Additionally, we aimed to interpret these prediction models using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods, including extracting important features and creating dependence plots. Lastly, we sought to predict and interpret individual outcomes, visualizing the results using the XAI technique known as SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP). In this prospective cohort study, conducted through a web-based survey, we established prediction models for QoL and health statuses, comparing their performance with ensemble methods, including decision trees, random forest, gradient boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and LightGBM. Following the model comparison, we selected the XGBoost model for further analysis. We identified crucial features associated with QoL and each health status separately and leveraged SHAP to extract individual prediction results from the XGBoost model. After preprocessing the data and selecting the appropriate model, our final dataset consisted of 256 cancer survivors with 42 predictive features. Repeated stratified K-fold validation demonstrated high performance of the XGBoost predictive model for QoL. Similarly, the XGBoost predictive model exhibited good performance for each health status, including mental, social, and spiritual well-being. The important features identified in these predictive models varied based on the specific health outcomes. This study represents the first endeavor to develop and validate predictive models for QoL and health status among cancer survivors while also providing interpretations of these models.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth StatusMachine LearningNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSelf-ManagementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40875761
PMCPMC12393778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.