ArticlePloS one2025
The critical effects of self-management strategies on predicting cancer survivors' future quality of life and health status using machine learning techniques.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the significance of enhancing the quality of life (QoL) and overall health status (including physical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being) among individuals who have survived cancer, the existing prediction model for QoL and health status lacks sufficient interpretation. Our primary objectives were to develop and validate simple prediction models for QoL and secondary health statuses. Additionally, we aimed to interpret these prediction models using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods, including extracting important features and creating dependence plots. Lastly, we sought to predict and interpret individual outcomes, visualizing the results using the XAI technique known as SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP). In this prospective cohort study, conducted through a web-based survey, we established prediction models for QoL and health statuses, comparing their performance with ensemble methods, including decision trees, random forest, gradient boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and LightGBM. Following the model comparison, we selected the XGBoost model for further analysis. We identified crucial features associated with QoL and each health status separately and leveraged SHAP to extract individual prediction results from the XGBoost model. After preprocessing the data and selecting the appropriate model, our final dataset consisted of 256 cancer survivors with 42 predictive features. Repeated stratified K-fold validation demonstrated high performance of the XGBoost predictive model for QoL. Similarly, the XGBoost predictive model exhibited good performance for each health status, including mental, social, and spiritual well-being. The important features identified in these predictive models varied based on the specific health outcomes. This study represents the first endeavor to develop and validate predictive models for QoL and health status among cancer survivors while also providing interpretations of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.