Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875742›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Grand multiparity and its associated factors in Zambia: Evidence from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey.

Peter Mumba, Emmanuel Musonda, Mwangala Mulasinkwanda, Jessy Mutale Nkonde, Vanessa Moonga, Stephen Jere, Samson Shumba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter MumbaDepartment of Demography, Population Sciences, Monitoring and Evaluation School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-2869
Emmanuel MusondaDepartment of Demography, Population Sciences, Monitoring and Evaluation School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-1265
Mwangala MulasinkwandaDepartment of Demography, Population Sciences, Monitoring and Evaluation School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jessy Mutale NkondeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-1710
Vanessa MoongaDepartment of Economics, School of Business, University of Lusaka, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9123-9791
Stephen JereDepartment of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning, Avencion Limited, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2919-4085
Samson ShumbaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5473-9332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grand multiparity, defined as having five or more births, is a significant public health problem, especially in low resource settings where fertility rates are generally higher than in high-resource settings due to socio-economic factors such as poverty and low levels of women's education, as well as disparities in access to modern contraceptives and advanced medical care. The study aimed to investigate the factors associated with grand multiparity in Zambia. The study analysed data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) using a weighted sample of 13,683 women aged 15-49 years. Univariate analysis was used to present percent distributions of the selected background characteristics of women. Bivariate analysis was used to examine the association between selected background characteristics and grand multiparity. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to identify factors of grand multiparity among women aged 15-49 years in Zambia. The prevalence of grand multiparity among women in Zambia was estimated at 24%. Women aged 25-29 years, 30-34 years, and 35 years or older had significantly higher odds of grand multiparity compared to women aged 15-24 years, with the highest odds observed in women aged 35 years or older (aOR=56.31, 95% CI: 11.626-272.780). Women with a first birth at age 25 years or older were 86% less likely to experience grand multiparity (aOR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.084-0.238). Higher education and wealth were protective factors, with women who attained secondary education (aOR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.182-0.418) and higher education (aOR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.046-0.174) having reduced odds of grand multiparity. Women from richer households were also less likely to experience grand multiparity (aOR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.337-0.701). Rural residence (aOR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.111-1.911) and contraceptive use (aOR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.074-1.545) were associated with increased odds of grand multiparity. Women with shorter birth intervals (less than 24 months) were almost three times more likely to be grand multiparous (aOR=2.74, 95% CI: 1.741-4.326). The findings underscore the complex interplay of socio-demographic factors in shaping reproductive patterns in Zambia. Strategies to reduce grand multiparity should consider promoting delayed marriage, increasing access to education and addressing rural-urban disparities in healthcare access and family planning services.

Identifiers

PMID40875742
PMCPMC12393760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.