ReviewNeonatology2025
Respiratory Support prior to Cord Clamping in Very Preterm Infants: A Narrative Review with Pooled Results from Recent Studies.
Review in Neonatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether very preterm infants benefit from provision of respiratory support prior to cord clamping has been an important knowledge gap. Four randomised controlled trials have recently been published on this topic and have provided new insights. These 4 studies and 2 previous ones included preterm infants less than 32 weeks of gestational age receiving deferred cord clamping (DCC). The intervention consisted of providing respiratory support in the form of continuous positive airways pressure or positive pressure ventilation via T piece. The intervention group had cord clamping performed when preset stability criteria were met in one study or after an elapsed time of up to 120 s was achieved in the other 5 studies (50-120 s range). The control group had time-based cord clamping after 30-60 s without respiratory support (5 studies) or cord milking (1 study). SUMMARY: Outcome measures based on important neonatal outcomes such as death, severe intraventricular haemorrhage (sIVH), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were reported as were other outcomes such as admission temperature and transfusions. Overall outcomes (death, sIVH, and BPD) were similar in intervention and control groups in these studies with moderate certainty of evidence to conclude there was no benefit for these outcomes. Maintaining normothermia was difficult, and the mean difference in admission temperature was significantly lower in the intervention group, although hypothermia was generally mild. KEY MESSAGE: Overall, the provision of respiratory support during DCC did not improve important neonatal outcomes (moderate certainty of evidence). Although we do not currently recommend the procedure as routine practice, we acknowledge there is room for further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.