ArticlePloS one2025
ProSPective evaluation of the dIagnostic accuracy of siNe spiN non-contrast flatdEtectoR CT (FDCT) for the detection of intracranial hemorrhage in stroke patients - Protocol of a non-inferiority comparison to multi detector CT.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05458908 (ProSPective Evaluation of the dIagnostic Accuracy of siNe spiN Noncontrast Flat-dEtectoR CT), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ProSPective Evaluation of the dIagnostic Accuracy of siNe spiN Noncontrast Flat-dEtectoR CT (FDCT) for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Stroke Patients
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sine spin flat-detector CT for enhanced brain parenchyma visualization: an intraindividual comparison on a latest-generation angiography system.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Size and location of intracranial hemorrhage in acute stroke presentations: correlation with baseline NIHSS and relevance to direct-to-angiography workflows.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleWhether syngo DynaCT Sine Spin non-contrast flat detector CT (FDCT) imaging is sufficient to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in suspected acute stroke patients is unknown.
aimTo determine if syngo DynaCT Sine Spin non-contrast FDCT imaging is non-inferior to conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) imaging for the detection and exclusion of intracranial hemorrhages in suspected acute stroke patients. SAMPLE SIZE: To enroll 252 participants in three buckets (126 ischemic stroke patients, 126 hemorrhagic stroke patients (including 14 patients with an isolated infratentorial hemorrhage). METHODS AND
designA multicenter, international, prospective, cross-sectional, endpoint assessor blinded, non-inferiority trial. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the occurrence of an intracranial hemorrhage (yes versus no). This will be used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of FDCT imaging for the detection of intracranial hemorrhages. All FDCT images will be rated by six independent raters in a blinded imaging core-lab. The rating of the MDCT images will be deemed as ground-truth. FDCT imaging will be deemed non-inferior if the lower bound of the 95%-Confidence Interval of the sensitivity and specificity is above 95%. DISCUSSION: This trial will inform physicians whether syngo DynaCT Sine Spin non-contrast FDCT imaging can reliably exclude intracranial hemorrhages in patients with suspected acute stroke.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05458908.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.