ArticlePloS one2025
Optimizing ensemble machine learning models for accurate liver disease prediction in healthcare.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of an AI-based pneumonia detection system on chest CT: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence predicts sex-specific risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver disease encompasses a range of conditions affecting the liver, including hepatitis, cirrhosis, fatty liver, and liver cancer. It can be caused by infections, alcohol abuse, obesity, or genetic factors, and it often progresses silently until advanced stages. Early detection and lifestyle adjustments are essential for effective management and to prevent severe liver damage. This study explores the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict liver disease, leveraging a dataset to compare the performance of several ensemble classifiers. The algorithms include the Random Forrest Classifier, Ada Boost Classifier, and Gradient Boosting Classifier. After a series of feature extraction and selection, hyperparameter tuning by Randomized Search CV and GridSearchCV, we aimed to determine the best model for liver disease prediction in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results showed that the Random Forest Classifier, optimized with GridSearchCV, achieved the highest accuracy at just over 85.17%. The considerations presented in this classifier can be considered for potential use as a precise diagnostic tool for liver disease diagnostics as these measurements indicate that this classifier works balanced with precision at 0.85 for both the presence and absence of the given disease as well as recall of 0.81 for its presence and 0.87 for its absence and F1-measure of 0.83 and 0.85 respectively. There were also relatively high performances of AdaBoost Classifier and Gradient Boosting Classifier, though none of the classifiers outperformed Random Forest Classifier significantly. The research has shown the potential of ensemble ML techniques, especially in the diagnosis of medical conditions, including liver diseases which, if diagnosed early, are critical. The results add evidence regarding the applicability of the ML models in clinical practices with the potential to improve diagnostic activities and consequently the outcomes of patients. Future studies will build on these models, testing them on larger and more diverse sets of data, including aspects of deep learning, and apply the research to other disease domains. The work presented in this research offers a starting point for carrying out innovations with ML in the sphere of healthcare to progress the methods of diagnosing diseases and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.