ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Emergence of extensively and pan-drug resistance in clinical bacterial isolates: A systematic scoping review from Ethiopian public health perspective.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance in Ethiopia and itsprogression towards XDR and PDR has become a critical public health concern. Therefore, thisreview determined the current state of emerging XDR and PDR bacteria, including pre-XDR and XDR-TB, their contributing factors, advancements, and future perspectives against drug-resistant bacteria, as well as their implications for public health and insights for future research. METHODOLOGY: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search of all available literature was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Hinari, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and African Journals Online databases.This study included original articles published in English that reported XDR and PDR bacteria, Pre-XDR-TB, and XDR-TBb without limit on the study period and publication year. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.
resultsTwenty-five studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included in this review. Among 5620 bacterial isolates identified,1289 were XDR (22.9%), with the prevalence ranging from 5.7% to 43.2%. A total of 440 bacterial isolates were PDR (9.1%), with its prevalence in individual studies ranged from 0.8% to 19.1%. The most common XDR bacteria identified were Klebsiella species; 26.7% (2.8%-84.6%), followed by E. coli; 26.4%(14.6%-35.7%), Acinetobacter species; 24.9%(10.1%-58.3%), and P. aeruginosa; 18.7% (2.8%-44.4%). The most frequently identified PDR bacteria were Acinetobacter species; 17.3% (7.9%-50.0%), followed by Klebsiella species; 13.7%(2.7%-25.8%), E. coli; 10.2%(2.4%-22.6%), and P. aeruginosa; 5.7%(4.3%-33.3%). Additionally, from 1419 MDR-TB and 160 TB confirmed cases, Pre-XDR-TB was 3.4% (2.4%-5.7%) and XDR-TB was 1.5%(0.6%-10.0%). These isolates were identified from different clinical specimens, which represents a significant concern in community and hospital settings.
conclusionThe emergence of XDR and PDR represents a major threat to Ethiopian public health, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalizations, high healthcare costs, and challenged treatment options. Urgent national surveillance and genomic detection of resistance mechanisms are needed to better track the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, promote antimicrobial stewardship, and enhance drug and vaccine trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.