Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875601›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025

Practice Effects and Long Delays: A Case Report Exploring a Novel Approach to Detecting Accelerated Long-Term Forgetting.

Chris Gaskell, Cleo Keeling-Ball, Callum Furniss, Jonathan Evans

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris GaskellNorth Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7589-5246
Cleo Keeling-BallNorth Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-3489-8181
Callum FurnissNorth Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke, UK.
Jonathan EvansSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-2071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccelerated Long-Term Forgetting (ALF) is when newly learned information "decays" faster than expected over an extended period and is associated with temporal-lobe epilepsy (TLE). There is no well-established method for assessing ALF despite its apparent prevalence. We hypothesized that evidencing an absence of practice effects may represent an effective approach to detecting ALF. We sought to determine if this method, along with the long-delay memory tests, could evidence ALF in a single case.

methodWe present a 66-year-old male with TLE who had memory complaints despite a stable memory profile over 4 years. Memory tests that employ a short (20-30 min) and a long delay (4 days) condition were used to assess forgetting, whereas repeatedly administered tests were used to detect practice effects. We anticipated poorer memory performance on the long versus short-delay test condition and a lack of improvement on memory tests that were repeated.

resultsFor repeat administration tests, there was a marked score increase, indicating practice effects, for verbal and visual domains. For long delay tests, however, there was a notable drop with retention falling in the exceptionally low range.

conclusionsThese findings suggest a dissociation between long delay and serial assessment tasks for detecting ALF.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, Temporal LobeMemory DisordersPractice, PsychologicalAgedHumansMaleMemory and Learning TestsNeuropsychological TestsTime FactorsAccelerated long-term forgettingPractice effectsSerial assessmentTemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID40875601
PMCPMC12540254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.