ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Decoding BCL6 Inhibitors: Computational Insights into the Impact of Water Networks on Potency.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling Using FAST/MBAR.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Solvent-Site Prediction for Fragment Docking and Its Implication on Fragment-Based Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water molecules in the binding site can have a critical role in small molecule binding to proteins and are an important consideration in structure-based drug design. Water networks have additional complexity as displacing one water molecule has subsequent effects on the remaining network. Modification of a lead compound that disrupts a water network can have beneficial or detrimental impacts on potency and this outcome is impossible to determine experimentally without time-consuming synthesis of the new compound. Computational methods are ideally suited to study the interplay between ligand optimization and water displacement by predicting the effect of structural changes on both the activity of the compound and the stability of neighboring water molecules. We used Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and alchemical free energy calculations to retrospectively study a series of B-cell Lymphoma 6 (BCL6) inhibitors that sequentially displaced water molecules from a network. The methods were used to rationalize the structure-activity relationship of the compounds by quantifying the individual contributions to the binding affinity from the changes in the water network and new interactions with the protein. GCMC simulations are well-suited for studying water networks in the binding site and were able to reproduce 94% of the experimentally observed water sites from the crystal structures in a subpocket of BCL6. Using the BCL6 project as an example, we show the power of these computational methods to study water networks and how they can provide insights that are able to guide drug discovery projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.