Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875594›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2026

Association between Bitter Taste Sensitivity and Weight Status in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alia Shareef, Getahun Fentaw Mulaw, Kruti Rathore, Chris Irwin, Lisa Vincze, Roshan Rigby, Rati Jani

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alia ShareefSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-2017-927X
Getahun Fentaw MulawSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-3759
Kruti RathoreDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bangalore University, Bengaluru 560056, India.ORCID 0009-0002-4463-6871
Chris IrwinSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-4271
Lisa VinczeSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-7147
Roshan RigbyFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4229, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-8371
Rati JaniSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-4420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextBitter taste sensitivity plays a role in dietary preferences and food intake, potentially affecting weight status. Despite previous studies performed to investigate this role, the relationship between bitter taste sensitivity and anthropometric measures remains inconclusive.

objectiveIn this review we sought to systematically evaluate the association between sensitivity to bitter taste and weight status in adults through a comprehensive meta-analysis and meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases for reported studies on this topic published up to March 2024. Included studies involved healthy adults and were published in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data on study characteristics, methods of assessing taste sensitivity, and anthropometric outcomes were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the American Dietetic Association Quality Criteria Checklist. DATA ANALYSIS: Meta-analysis of 27 studies (80 effect estimates) revealed no significant association between bitter taste sensitivity and overall weight status (Cohen's dz, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.05, P = .58). Subgroup analyses also showed no significant differences between nontasters, medium tasters, and supertasters. Meta-regression indicated that the waist-hip ratio was a significant moderator (P = .004). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 91.5%), and publication bias was minimal.

conclusionsBitter taste sensitivity does not significantly influence overall weight status but may affect body fat distribution. Methodological variability and population differences highlight the need for standardized protocols in future research. These findings contribute to understanding taste sensitivity in obesity prevention and dietary behavior strategies.

Indexed as

Body WeightTasteAdultFood PreferencesHumansObesitybitter taste sensitivitydietmeta-analysisTAS2Rsweight status

Identifiers

PMID40875594
PMCPMC12696387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.