ArticleJAMA2025
Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving landscape of AI in publishing.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- When machines misread science: creating guardrails for human and AI interpretation of biomedical research.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Models and the Future of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publishing: Challenges, Editorial Responses, and a Framework for Responsible Integration.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
- The Challenges of Scientific Publishing: An Editor-In-Chief's Perspective.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Susceptibility of large language models to hidden nudge injection during simulated medical peer review: a quasi-experimental study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- AI in Medical Education Research, Writing, and Reviewing: JGME's Policy in 2026.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Scientific Publishing: Policy Landscape for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing big data and artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine: Opportunities for precision, safety and efficiency.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Our AI-Powered Discoveries Are Trapped in a Predigital System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Predatory medical journals' awareness among clinical and non-clinical researchers in Saudi Arabia: a survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The role of society journals in protecting the scientific record.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Scientific Reviewing-Editors' Memo to Emerging Reviewers - 2.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Article
- Expert assignment system based on natural language processing for Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Missing Conflict of Interest Disclosure.JAMA · 2025Article
- Article
- The evolving roles of editors and reviewers for nonhuman "authors": Consequences for the integrity of scientific literature and medical knowledge.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
40875583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.