Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875535›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Autocycler: long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes.

Ryan R Wick, Benjamin P Howden, Timothy P Stinear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome sequences of 71 ecologically and geographically diverseMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  11. Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  12. Complete genome sequence of multidrug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Development andMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genomic diversity ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  20. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan R WickDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8349-0778
Benjamin P HowdenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Timothy P StinearDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher DE250100677NHMRC Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLong-read sequencing enables complete bacterial genome assemblies, but individual assemblers are imperfect and often produce sequence-level and structural errors. Consensus assembly using Trycycler can improve accuracy, but its lack of automation limits scalability. There is a need for an automated method to generate high-quality consensus bacterial genome assemblies from long-read data.

resultsWe present Autocycler, a command-line tool for generating accurate bacterial genome assemblies by combining multiple alternative long-read assemblies of the same genome. Without requiring user input, Autocycler builds a compacted De Bruijn graph from the input assemblies, clusters and filters contigs, trims overlaps, and resolves consensus sequences by selecting the most common variant at each locus. It also supports manual curation when desired, allowing users to refine assemblies in challenging or important cases. In our evaluation using Oxford Nanopore Technologies reads from five bacterial isolates, Autocycler outperformed individual assemblers, automated pipelines, and other consensus tools, producing assemblies with lower error rates and improved structural accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Autocycler is implemented in Rust, open-source, and freely available at github.com/rrwick/Autocycler. It runs on Linux and macOS and is extensively documented.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAlgorithmsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40875535
PMCPMC12460055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.