ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Which women go for screening?
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer accounts for approximately one-third of deaths in developed countries. Preventing cancer, notably by detecting new cases early, is thus crucial. In the European Union (EU), screening rates have been recommended for several types of cancer; however, most EU countries are still not meeting them. Determining how we can improve people's adherence to screening is necessary. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of women associated with being up-to-date on mammograms or Pap smears; notably, we wanted to determine the extent to which women's attitudes towards risk play a role in their adherence to screening. The sample comprised 1411 women who responded to a telephone survey. The survey data, including sociodemographic characteristics, health information, attitudes towards the future, and attitudes towards risk, collected via the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale, were supplemented by medico-administrative data. The factors associated with undergoing either a mammogram or a Pap smear in a timely manner were similar. Two favourable factors were found: the number of children and a high level of education. In contrast, being older or having a higher DOSPERT score for risk-taking appeared to be negatively associated with timely screening. The fact that women's attitudes towards risk seem to have a strong impact on their adherence to medical recommendations is a finding that should be considered (e.g. by health professionals or in prevention campaigns) regarding increasing women's awareness of the importance of regular cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.