Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875321›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2026

Iconic number gestures: Naturalistic use by children and parents in the early home environment.

Madeleine Oswald, Alana Foley, Susan Goldin-Meadow, Susan C Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeleine OswaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-7343
Alana FoleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago.
Susan Goldin-MeadowDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago.
Susan C LevineDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-9290

Funding

Using Language of Higher Order Thinking in Varying EnvironmentsP01HD040605 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOLDIN-MEADOW, SUSAN J · 2002 to 2018
$19.2M
Heising-Simons FoundationNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Science FoundationNational Science Foundation; Spatial Intelligence and Learning CenterNICHD NIH HHS P01 HD040605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that children's use and understanding of cardinal number gestures (e.g., raising two fingers to indicate "two") reflect greater cardinal number knowledge than their number words alone (e.g., Butts, 2025; Gibson et al., 2019, 2022; Gunderson et al., 2015; Orrantia et al., 2024; Oswald et al., 2025). The present study adds to these findings by examining how often, and in what contexts, parents and their young children use iconic number gestures, with a particular focus on how these gestures are used in relation to number words. In a naturalistic, at-home longitudinal study, we found that 14- to 58-month-old children and their parents used iconic number gestures far less often than number words. Parents used more number words than the children, but children used more number gestures than the parents. Both children and parents used number gestures more often for nonpresent entities than for present entities, even though they both displayed the opposite pattern for number words (i.e., more number words for present than nonpresent entities). Finally, children were more likely to use number gestures if their parents used them (some parents never used number gestures during the observations), but neither parents' nor children's use of number gestures early on predicted children's cardinal number knowledge at 46 months of age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentGesturesHome EnvironmentMathematical ConceptsParent-Child RelationsParentsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMale

Identifiers

PMID40875321
PMCPMC12396510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.