Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875167›Full record

ArticleInfection2025

Machine learning identifies clinical sepsis phenotypes that translate to the plasma proteome.

Thilo Bracht, Maike Weber, Kerstin Kappler, Lars Palmowski, Malte Bayer, Karin Schork, Tim Rahmel, Matthias Unterberg, Helge Haberl, Alexander Wolf and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plasma proteomics identifies molecular subtypes in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Thilo BrachtDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Thilo.bracht@rub.de.
Maike WeberMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Kerstin KapplerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lars PalmowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Malte BayerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Karin SchorkMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tim RahmelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Matthias UnterbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Helge HaberlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Alexander WolfDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Björn KoosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Katharina RumpDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Dominik ZieheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ulrich LimperDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Medical School, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Dietrich HenzlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Klinikum Herford, 32049, Herford, Germany.
Stefan Felix EhrentrautKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Thilo von GrooteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Katrin Marcus-AlicMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martin EisenacherMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Michael AdamzikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Barbara SitekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Hartmuth NowakDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Hartmuth.Nowak@kk-bochum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis therapy is still limited to treatment of the underlying infection and supportive measures. To date, various sepsis subtypes were proposed, but therapeutic options addressing the molecular changes of sepsis were not identified. With the aim of a future individualized therapy, we used machine learning (ML) to identify clinical phenotypes and their temporal development in a prospective, multicenter sepsis cohort and characterized them using plasma proteomics.

methodsRoutine clinical data and blood samples were collected from 384 patients. Sepsis phenotypes were identified based on clinical measurements and plasma samples from 301 patients were analyzed using mass spectrometry. The obtained data were evaluated in relation to the phenotypes, and supervised ML models were developed enabling prospective phenotype classification.

resultsThree sepsis phenotypes were identified. Cluster C was characterized by the highest disease severity and multi-organ failure with leading liver failure. Cluster B showed relevant organ failure, with renal damage being particularly prominent in comparison to cluster A. Time course analysis showed a strong association of cluster C with mortality, while patients in cluster B were likely to change the cluster until day 4. The plasma proteome reflected the clinical features of the phenotypes and showed gradual consumption of complement and coagulation factors with increasing sepsis severity. Supervised ML models allowed the assignment of patients based on only seven widely available features (alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), base excess (BE), international normalized ratio of thrombin time (INR), diastolic arterial blood pressure, systolic arterial blood pressure (BPdia, BPsys) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)).

conclusionsThe identified clinical phenotypes reflected varying degrees of sepsis severity and were mirrored in the plasma proteome. Proteomic profiling offered novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying sepsis and enabled a deeper characterization of the identified phenotypes.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsMachine LearningProteomeSepsisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeProspective StudiesProteomicsBlood ProteinsProteomeArtificial intelligenceCluster analysisMass spectrometryPrecision medicineProteomicsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40875167
PMCPMC12675651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.