ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Consider the unexpected! An overlooked, elusive, rare but dramatic diagnosis: anorectal melanoma.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anastomotic reinforcement in rectal surgery: a position statement from an expert panel of colorectal surgeons.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, often misdiagnosed due to its clinical resemblance to benign anorectal conditions. Early diagnosis remains challenging, with a poor prognosis and high rates of metastasis at presentation.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 21 patients diagnosed with AM between 2013 and 2023 across four high-volume Italian surgical centers. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether AM was suspected at initial evaluation (Group A) or incidentally diagnosed after surgery for presumed benign disease (Group B). Clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed.
resultsOnly 24% of patients had AM suspected at first presentation. These patients were younger (median age 49 vs. 70 years) and had larger, more readily identifiable tumors. However, nodal and distant metastases were equally frequent in both groups (lymph node metastases: 52.4%; distant metastases: 19%). Most patients underwent wide local excision (71.4%), while only one required abdominoperineal resection. Postoperative recurrence occurred in 47.6% of cases. Median survival was 11 months in Group A and 24 months in Group B. In 90.5% of cases, previous specialist consultations had failed to achieve timely diagnosis, highlighting missed diagnostic opportunities.
conclusionsAM is frequently overlooked due to its rarity and non-specific presentation. Earlier recognition alone may not improve outcomes, but systematic histopathological assessment, targeted biopsy, and multidisciplinary management remain essential. Conservative surgery with early use of systemic therapy should be prioritized when feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.