ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Obsessive-compulsive disorder detection using ensemble of scalp EEG-based convolutional neural network.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) causes unwanted thoughts and repetitive actions and leads to many problems in a person's life. In this study, Electroencephalography (EEG) signals and deep learning methods were used to diagnose OCD patients early. Three popular pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models are developed for scalp-EEG data analysis: EEGNet, Shallow ConvNet, and Deep ConvNet. Three pre-trained CNNs were utilized as transfer learning models. Following the fine-tuning of models with our raw EEG data, an ensemble of three scalp EEG-based CNN models was used, employing weighted majority voting, in which weights of these base classifiers were optimized by the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm. Shallow ConvNet has the highest performance with an accuracy of 85.91±0.72, sensitivity of 82.19±0.72, and specificity of 93.34±2.91 among all models. Ensemble these three scalp EEG-based CNN models achieved superior performance with an accuracy of 87.03±0.46, sensitivity of 82.21±0.56, and specificity of 96.69±1.28. Consequently, a hybrid proposed model based on pre-treatment raw EEG signals can independently extract distinctive characteristics and accurately identify OCD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40875137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.