ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Detection of Jaw Lesions on Panoramic Radiographs Using Deep Learning Method.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 4, and other LLMs on pediatric dentistry questions from a dental specialization exam.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models for detecting and segmenting both radiolucent and radiopaque jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs. A total of 2371 anonymized panoramic radiographs containing jaw lesions were retrospectively collected and categorized into radiolucent and radiopaque datasets. Expert annotation was performed to delineate lesion boundaries and assign anatomical localization (anterior/posterior maxilla and mandible). Four deep learning architectures-YOLOv8, YOLOv11, Mask R-CNN, and RT-DETR-were trained and evaluated under three experimental scenarios: (I) training without spatial labels, (II) data augmentation with unlabeled background images, and (III) inclusion of spatial localization annotations. Performance metrics included precision, recall, F1-score, and mean average precision (mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5-0.95), with paired t-tests used for statistical comparison. In Scenario I, YOLOv11x-seg and YOLOv8x-seg achieved the highest segmentation performance for radiolucent and radiopaque lesions, respectively. For detection, YOLOv8x performed best on radiolucent lesions, while RT-DETR-L outperformed others on radiopaque lesions. In Scenario II, while YOLOv8x-seg achieved the best segmentation results across both lesion types, RT-DETR-L demonstrated superior detection performance, particularly for radiolucent lesions. In Scenario III, RT-DETR-L consistently outperformed all models across both lesion types. This study demonstrates the potential of state-of-the-art deep learning models for effective detection of lesions in panoramic radiographs. The developed models may offer valuable support to clinicians in lesion evaluation; however, it is recommended that they be employed primarily as decision support tools within clinical workflows, rather than as standalone diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.