SynthesisBrain topography2025
The Effect of Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cerebral Blood Flow: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-invasive neuroregulation techniques applied to patients with consciousness disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that delivers a constant low electric current through electrodes placed on the scalp. A significant amount of research has explored the clinical potential of tDCS in psychiatric disorders. However, the mechanism of tDCS' behavioural effects remains largely unknown. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a surrogate marker of neural activity and has been used as an index of brain dysfunction in various psychiatric disorders. Studies have shown that single-session tDCS can modulate regional CBF in humans, however, these results as yet have not been systematically reviewed. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the immediate effects of single-session tDCS on regional CBF. A literature search of English language publications in humans was conducted through Ovid database using Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO (last search in August 2023). The following search terms were used: (transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS) and (cerebral blood flow or cerebrovascular circulation). Studies that reported sufficient data for calculating the pooled effect size of regional CBF change from baseline to immediately post-tDCS were included. The analysis was separated by anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation. The search identified 188 English language publications. Four papers were deemed eligible for the analysis, while two of them were based on the same sample. Studies varied in terms of tDCS montage, stimulation protocol, and population studied. The meta-analysis found a decrease in regional CBF following single-session cathodal tDCS stimulation (n = 34) and no effect of single-session anodal (n = 58) or sham tDCS (n = 52). However, increased regional CBF following anodal tDCS was significantly associated with older age, sex (% male), and higher current intensity and density based on the results of exploratory moderator and subgroup analyses. The results of this meta-analysis contribute to the growing body of knowledge investigating the cerebral mechanisms of tDCS. Given the limited number and heterogeneity of available studies, further investigation into the effects of single- and multi-session tDCS on regional CBF in clinical or healthy participant samples is warranted to gain a better mechanistic understanding of tDCS' therapeutic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40875070What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.