Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875068›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Effect of charcoal-based dentifrices on the surface integrity and gloss of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics.

Victor Martins Stabile, Ana Caroline Lima Colombino, Andrey Gonçalves Emídio, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso, Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Martins StabileDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 2227, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9444-2306
Ana Caroline Lima ColombinoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, 901 Limeira Avenue, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-369X
Andrey Gonçalves EmídioDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, 901 Limeira Avenue, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-1505
Lourenço Correr-SobrinhoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, 901 Limeira Avenue, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-7407
Roberta Caroline Bruschi AlonsoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 2227, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-8687
Regina Maria Puppin-RontaniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, 901 Limeira Avenue, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil. rmpuppin@unicamp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5159

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of commercially charcoal-based dentifrices on the surface roughness and gloss retention of glazed lithium disilicate glass-ceramics subjected to simulated toothbrushing. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-two glazed lithium disilicate specimens (IPS e.max CAD) were randomly assigned to three dentifrice groups (n = 24): two charcoal-based (Carvvo (CVV), Curaprox Black is White (CBW)) and one conventional (Colgate Total 12 (C12)), the control. Toothbrushing simulations were performed for 5,000, 10,000, and 20,000 cycles. Roughness (Ra) and gloss (GU) were measured at baseline and after each cycle. Surface characterization was performed using three-dimensional profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which also analyzed abrasive particles. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).

resultsRoughness was affected only by dentifrice type (p = 0.004), with CVV producing higher mean values than C12, and CBW not differing from the others. Brushing cycle (p = 0.164) and interaction (p = 0.095) were non-significant. Gloss was affected by dentifrice (p < 0.001), brushing cycle (p < 0.001), and their interaction (p < 0.001). Charcoal-based dentifrices caused gloss reductions (CVV: 80.77GU baseline to 67.41GU at 20,000 cycles; CBW: 86.39GU baseline to 69.62GU at 20,000 cycles). In contrast, C12 increased gloss, reaching up to 95.97GU at 20,000 cycles.

conclusionsCharcoal-based dentifrices significantly compromise the surface integrity of glazed lithium disilicate ceramics by increasing roughness and reducing gloss. Conventional dentifrices demonstrate no deleterious effect on ceramic surfaces and may even enhance gloss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Routine use of charcoal-based dentifrices may accelerate surface wear and reduce optical properties of ceramic restorations, potentially compromising longevity and esthetic outcomes.

Indexed as

CeramicsCharcoalDental PorcelainDentifricesHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSurface PropertiesToothbrushingCharcoalDental PorcelainDentifricesGlass ceramicslithia disilicateCeramicsCharcoalDental materialsDentifricesToothbrushing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.