ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
"Two-stage resection of synchronous liver metastases in colorectal cancer leads to a survival benefit: a retrospective comparative cohort study".
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Resection Sequence in Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Primary vs. Liver First.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, with 15-25% of patients presenting synchronous liver metastases (UICC stage IV). Surgical resection remains crucial, but the optimal sequence for managing synchronous metastases is debated. This study evaluates the impact of different surgical strategies on survival in colorectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases (CRLM) and identifies factors influencing mortality.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed CRLM patients from German cancer registries in Brandenburg and Berlin from 2017 to 2022, grouped by surgical treatment sequence: simultaneous primary tumor resection (PTR) and liver resection, PTR before liver resection, or liver resection before PTR. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses evaluated overall survival (OS) and the impact of systemic therapy and patient characteristics.
resultsAmong 23,394 colorectal cancer patients, 209 met inclusion criteria. Simultaneous resection was performed in 45% (N = 93), PTR before liver resection in 43% (N = 90), and liver resection first in 12% (N = 26). PTR before liver resection showed the best 5-year OS (68% vs. 53% for simultaneous surgery; HR 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22-0.88, p = 0.020). Simultaneous resection had the highest 30-day mortality (6.5%, N = 6). Postoperative chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS (66% vs. 57% for no chemotherapy; HR 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22-0.95, p = 0.036). Excluding 30-day mortality, survival differences diminished.
conclusionPrimary tumor resection before liver resection appears to improve long-term survival in CRLM patients. Simultaneous resection should be carefully considered due to increased mortality, particularly in older patients with lower performance status undergoing major liver surgery. Postoperative chemotherapy enhances survival, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.