ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Validation of the Aarhus periacetabular osteotomy database.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. In Denmark, patients undergoing PAO at two orthopaedic departments are registered in a disease registry, the Aarhus PAO-database. This study aimed to validate the Aarhus PAO-database by assessing the registration completeness compared to the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients registered in the Aarhus PAO-database were compared to patients identified in DNPR as having undergone PAO for hip dysplasia. Further, a random selection of 20 PAO procedures from each registry per year (2014-2021) was validated by comparing the information from the registries to the hospital's electronic medical records.
resultsBetween 2014 and 2021, 1144 PAO procedures were registered in the Aarhus PAO-database and 1150 in DNPR. The overall registration completeness was 94.7% (95% CI: 93.3;95.9) with 1116 PAO proceduresincluded in both datasets. The diagnosis and surgery procedure were verified as hip dysplasia and PAO for all randomly selected patients, and almost all discrepancies were resolved (> 95%), using the medical records.
conclusionThe Aarhus PAO-database has effectively captured all patients who underwent PAO for hip dysplasia from 2014 to 2021. It appears to be a valid resource for future research as well as for ensuring and improving the quality of hip dysplasia treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.