ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
LipidSnapshot - Treatment gaps in hypercholesterolemia in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease documented by office-based cardiologists and general practitioners in Germany.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- A call for high-intensity lipid-lowering treatment of ASCVD patients diagnosed by coronary computed tomography angiography: lessons from the multi-center LOCATE study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- A practical guide to the management of dyslipidaemia.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsOffice-based cardiologists (OBCs) and general practitioners (GPs) follow different approaches for hypercholesterolemia management in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study evaluates whether differences in clinical practice between OBCs and GPs contribute to existing gaps in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] screening in ASCVD care.
methodsLipidSnapshot is a collaborative research initiative comprising a prospective non-interventional study at OBCs and a retrospective analysis of GP records. It evaluates LDL-C target attainment, Lp(a) testing, and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in the OBC and the GP setting. Subgroup analyses by gender and age are conducted.
resultsThe dataset comprises 1,500 ASCVD patients from OBCs and 82,375 patients from GPs. The median LDL-C levels were 68 mg/dL (OBC) vs. 88 mg/dL (GP). LDL-C targets < 55 mg/dL were achieved in 27.4% of patients (OBC) vs. 12.1% of patients (GP). Lp(a) testing rate was 20.3% (OBC) vs. 3.0% (GP). The proportion of patients not receiving any LLT was 1.5% (OBC) vs. 26.6% (GP). LDL-C levels were numerically higher in female patients as well as in younger patients especially in the GP setting. Female patients were less likely to receive LLT compared to their male counterparts and half of the GP patients < 50 years of age remained untreated at all.
conclusionA large proportion of ASCVD patients in Germany are inadequately treated, with notable differences between GPs and OBCs. Additionally, gender and age-related disparities are evident. There is a clear need for these gaps to be addressed to improve cross-sectional patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.