Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875009›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Integrating the Perspectives of Youth, Women, and Marginalised Communities in Addressing Global Environmental Management Challenges.

Richard Kwame Adom, Gbenga Abayomi Afuye, Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba, Mulala Danny Simatele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard Kwame AdomSchool of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. richardquame1@gmail.com.
Gbenga Abayomi AfuyeDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.
Ahmed Mukalazi KalumbaDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.
Mulala Danny SimateleSchool of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Mulala.Simatele@wits.ac.za.

Funding

Global Change Social Sciences Research Programme 129481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, environmental mismanagement, overconsumption, population growth, and lifestyle changes disproportionately impact society, particularly affecting marginalized and vulnerable groups in developing nations. Despite progress in raising awareness and funding, many initiatives, including Youth Engagement Programs, Capacity Building, Gender (women) Mainstreaming, and Community-Based Approaches, have been limited or ineffective due to demographic variability. This study employed qualitative and quantitative methods to examine institutional factors that hinder the effective use of demographic variables in addressing global environmental challenges. It explores how institutional and structural factors obstruct the integration of demographic variables into global environmental policies and programs. The results show that over 65 percent of the global population, particularly youth, women, and marginalized groups, remain passive victims of environmental disasters and are largely excluded from national and international decision-making platforms. This study reveals significant gender disparities in environmental knowledge, interest, and decision-making across Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Asia, largely shaped by cultural traditions and norms. This study advocates for targeted capacity-building initiatives and the integration of indigenous knowledge to foster inclusive growth, enhance knowledge-sharing mechanisms, and address the underrepresentation of youth, women, and marginalized groups. These findings offer evidence-based insights for policymakers, researchers, and environmental organizations to enhance global environmental governance by promoting inclusivity and innovative solutions that empower these groups for active participation in policy decision-making.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PolicyAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleCommunity EmpowermentEnvironment and YouthEquitable SolutionsGender and SustainabilityPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40875009
PMCPMC12575522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.