Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875008›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

eDNA Adoption: Weighing the Benefits and Challenges from Quebec Potential End-Users' Perspective.

Caroline Thivierge, Lynda Gagné, Limoilou-Amélie Renaud, Émilie Houde-Tremblay, Jérôme Dupras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline ThiviergeDepartment of Natural Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada. thic31@uqo.ca.ORCID 0009-0006-5644-8025
Lynda GagnéCanada Research Chair in Ecological Economics, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-9102
Limoilou-Amélie RenaudSchool of Indigenous Studies, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8496-3979
Émilie Houde-TremblayDepartment of Natural Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
Jérôme DuprasDepartment of Natural Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5422-6345

Funding

Genome British Columbia #312ITDGenome Quebec #312ITD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The collection of environmental DNA (eDNA) is a relatively new, non-invasive and effective method for detecting the presence of rare or endangered species, invasive alien species, and monitoring fish and wildlife populations, thus contributing to better conservation of natural environments. Academic researchers are its main users. The reasons for its slow diffusion among other potential users remain poorly documented to date. This study aimed to characterize the barriers and levers to the adoption of eDNA by distinct types of end-users, depending on the contexts in which they operate. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 33 participants to document and analyze their perceptions of eDNA. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) inspired our analysis. Our findings revealed that potential end-users perceive the eDNA-based methods positively, although they are improvable. A lack of knowledge about its limitations and potential affects how useful eDNA is perceived to be and potential end-users' confidence in its results. We propose action levers to increase potential end-users' trust in the method and its compatibility with their current practices, and identify avenues to facilitate its diffusion.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsEndangered SpeciesFemaleHumansIntroduced SpeciesMaleQuebecDNA, EnvironmentalDiffusion of innovationEnvironmental DNAInnovation adoptionResistance to innovationStakeholder analysisTechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID40875008
PMCPMC12457547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.