Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874991›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Artificial intelligence in total body photography, digital dermoscopy and high-resolution dermoscopy].

S Hobelsberger, A-T Seitz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S HobelsbergerKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Fakultät und Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland. Sarah.Hobelsberger@ukdd.de.
A-T SeitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of malignant melanoma has increased exponentially in recent decades. The combination of total body photography (TBP) and digital dermoscopy (DD) improved the early detection of melanoma in previous studies. Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists.

objectivesIn the present work, the applications of AI in TBP, DD, and high-resolution dermoscopy in clinical practice are evaluated. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature review was conducted of previous studies on the use of TBP, DD, and high-resolution dermoscopy and the integration of AI in these devices for the early detection of melanoma. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe use of AI can improve the diagnostic accuracy of TBP, DD, and high-resolution dermoscopy. As most of the studies to date have been conducted in an artificial setting, more studies are needed to evaluate the potential use of AI in the clinical setting. In addition, staff must be trained and informed about the legal framework regarding the use of AI in everyday clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDermoscopyMelanomaPhotographySkin NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansDiagnostic accuracyDigital dermoscopyHigh-resolution dermoscopyMalignant melanomaNoninvasive imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.