ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Subjective language disturbances in young patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR): what relevance for clinical prognosis? A 2-year follow-up study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Basic symptoms of psychosis-from historical foundations to current evidence.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLanguage impairment has the potential to predict the onset and progression of psychosis. However, it was mainly examined using automated extraction of quantitative linguistic features and their associations with observable psychopathological aspects of psychosis (e.g., formal thought disorders). Little interest has been paid to subjective language disturbances that should phenomenologically anticipate these more objective clinical features. Therefore, the aim of this examination was to investigate subjective language disorders in a Ultra-High Risk (UHR) sample and their associations with clinical and functional outcomes along 2 years of follow-up.
methods170 UHR participants (88 [51.8%] females; mean age = 19.52 ± 6.03 years) were assessed for a broad range of clinical outcomes, including psychosis transition, clinical and functional remission measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. Comparisons between patients with or without baseline subjective language disorders (specifically explored with the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument) were analyzed using Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and binary logistic regression analysis.
resultsAcross the follow-up, the UHR subgroup with language disorders at entry (n = 80) showed higher and more enduring severity in psychopathology (especially negative and disorganized features), as well as poorer socio-occupational functioning over time.
conclusionThe presence of subjective language disturbances at baseline identifies a subgroup of UHR youths with poorer psychopathological and functional prognosis. Further studies examining their association with quantitative linguistic biomarkers are needed, especially to better predict the onset and progression of psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.