ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
ESM2_AMP: an interpretable framework for protein-protein interactions prediction and biological mechanism discovery.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AlphaInterp: Mechanistic Interpretability of AlphaFold 3 Reveals How Evolutionary Information Shapes Protein Structure Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Accessibility in proteins and RNAs interactions prediction with machine learning: are we overlooking non-experts?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Supervised fine-tuning enhances unsupervised learning from 45 million amino acids in TCR and peptide sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Dual-channel graph learning reveals similarity and complementarity in protein-protein interaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- DSS-PPI: a self-supervised graph learning framework for protein-protein interaction prediction via multimodal sequence semantics.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- PlantAMP: A fine-tuned protein large language model for plant antimicrobial peptide prediction.Plant communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of binary protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is essential for protein engineering, but a major challenge in deep learning-based methods is the unknown decision-making process of the model. To address this challenge, we propose the ESM2_AMP framework, which utilizes the ESM2 protein language model for extracting segment features from actual amino acid sequences and integrates the Transformer model for feature fusion in binary PPIs prediction. Further, the two distinct models, ESM2_AMPS and ESM2_AMP_CSE are developed to systematically explore the contributions of segment features and combine with special tokens features in the decision-making process. The experimental results reveal that the model relying on segment features demonstrates strong correlations between segments with high attention weights and known functional regions of amino acid sequences. This insight suggests that attention to these segments helps capture biologically relevant functional and interaction-related information. By analyzing the coverage relationship between high-attention sequence fragments and functional regions, we validated the model's ability to capture key segment features of PPIs and revealed the critical role of functional domains in PPIs. This finding not only enhances the interpretability methods for sequence-based prediction models but also provides biological evidence supporting the important regulatory role of functional sequences in protein-protein interactions. It offers cross-disciplinary insights for algorithm optimization and experimental validation research in the field of computational biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.