Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874805›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025

Evaluation of Buccal Bone Thickness and Root Length of Maxillary Incisors in Deep Bite Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Zahra Alsadat Emami Meybodi, Omid Mortezai, Zeynab Shalli, Maryam Tofangchiha, Elham Emami Meybodi, Abolfazl Razi Avarzamani

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zahra Alsadat Emami MeybodiDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Omid MortezaiDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Zeynab ShalliDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Maryam TofangchihaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Elham Emami MeybodiOral and Maxillofacial Radiologist, Yazd, Iran.
Abolfazl Razi AvarzamaniQazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the buccal bone thickness and root length of the maxillary incisors in deep bite patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsCone beam computed tomography data of 124 patients were randomly selected in this cross-sectional study. In the study, patients were divided into two groups, normal bite and deep bite, and buccal bone thickness and root length of the maxillary incisors were measured. Buccal bone thickness was measured at 4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction and at the midpoint of the root.

resultsBy comparing these factors between the two groups of normal and deep bite, only the difference in the buccal bone thickness at the midpoint of the root of the central incisor between these two groups was statistically significant. Also, by comparing these factors between male and female patients, the root length of the central and lateral incisors and the buccal bone thickness in the mid root of the central incisor were significantly more in Men.

conclusionA significant disparity in the buccal bone thickness at the mid-root level of central incisors between normal bite and deep overbite patients was revealed.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessCone-Beam Computed TomographyIncisorMaxillaOverbiteTooth RootAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCBCTdeep biteincisor

Identifiers

PMID40874805
PMCPMC12392419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.