ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025
RETRACTION: Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Polymorphisms in Glaucoma: A Hospital-Based Study in Chinese Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionZhao F. Fan Z. Huang X. Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Polymorphisms in Glaucoma: A Hospital-Based Study in Chinese Patients Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 34 no. 3 (2020): e23105, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23105 The above article, published online on 12 November 2019 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Rong Fu; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The retraction has been agreed due to scientific inconsistencies and major flaws in the statistical evaluation. The journal received a request to retract this manuscript initially. During investigation, the authors stated that original data is no longer available and did not provide documentation for the ethical approval process of this study. Nanchong Central Hospital could not be reached for comment. Subsequently, the authors stopped responding. The conclusions of this manuscript are considered unreliable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.