ArticleJournal of vision2025
Where do I go? Decoding temporal neural dynamics of scene processing and visuospatial memory interactions using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What does my network learn? Assessing interpretability of deep learning for EEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual scene perception enables rapid interpretation of the surrounding environment by integrating multiple visual features related to task demands and context, which is essential for goal-directed behavior. In the present work, we investigated the temporal neural dynamics underlying the interaction between the processing of bottom-up visual features and top-down contextual knowledge during scene perception. We asked whether newly acquired spatial knowledge would immediately modulate the early neural responses involved in the extraction of navigational affordances available (i.e., the number of open doors). For this purpose, we analyzed electroencephalographic data from 30 participants performing interleaved blocks of a scene memory task and a visuospatial memory task in which we manipulated the number of navigational affordances available. We used convolutional neural networks coupled with gradient-weighted class activation mapping to assess the main electroencephalographic channels and time points contributing to the classification performances. The results indicated an early temporal window of integration in occipitoparietal activity (50-250 ms post stimulus) for several aspects of visual perception, including scene color and number of affordances, as well as for spatial memory content. Moreover, a convolutional neural network trained to detect affordances in the scene memory task failed to generalize to detect the same affordances after participants learned spatial information about goal position within the scene. Taken together, these results reveal an early common window of integration for scene and visuospatial memory information, with a specific and immediate top-down influence of newly acquired spatial knowledge on early neural correlates of scene perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.