ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Middle meningeal artery embolization with SwiftPAC coils for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ObjectiveMiddle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has been shown to lower recurrence and reoperation rates of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the initial use, safety, and effectiveness of SwiftPAC (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) coils for MMAE.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive MMAE performed with SwiftPAC coils for in patients with cSDHs. Liquid or particle embolization was excluded. Selection criteria for adjunct versus stand-alone MMAE were based on clinical judgement. Outcome measures included were a decrease in size of the cSDH, decreased size >50%, midline shift, reoccurrence or progression, retreatment, clinical stability or symptom improvement, and procedure-related complications.ResultsTwenty-three patients/31 hemispheres received MMAEs (eight bilateral and 15 unilateral) with SwiftPAC coils. Twenty-two patients (96%) had clinical and radiographic follow-up (median 54 days), and one patient was lost to follow-up. Sixteen (69.6%) MMAEs were performed as an adjunct to surgical drainage; seven (30.4%) were stand-alone MMAEs. No procedural-related complications were observed. Clinical stability or symptom improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 95.4% of patients (21/22). Radiographic improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 93.3% (28/30). Nineteen (63.3%) cSDHs had a decrease in size >50% and nine cSDHs (30%) demonstrated complete resolution. One patient required retreatment for recurrence.ConclusionsMMAE with SwiftPAC coils can be performed with a high safety profile and good radiographic and clinical outcomes. Given the small size and no comparison cohort, further research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.