ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
The application of silent MRA in follow-up after intracranial aneurysm endovascular treatment.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo assess the diagnostic value of silent MRA in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms (IA) post-endovascular treatment.MethodsFrom March 2023 to March 2024, we retrospectively collected data on patients with IA who underwent endovascular intervention and received silent MRA follow-up. All images were anonymized and evaluated on a 5-point scale: 1 (not visible, strong artifacts); 2 (poor quality, numerous artifacts/blurring); 3 (acceptable quality, moderate artifacts/blurring); 4 (good quality, minor blur artifacts); 5 (very good quality, nearly equal to DSA). The quality and occlusion status of aneurysms were descriptively analyzed.ResultsA total of 451 patients with 475 IA treated at our hospital received silent MRA follow-up. The silent MRA showed 100% 5-point scores in the coil embolization group. In the stent-assisted group, 65.7% achieved a 5-point score, and in the flow-diverter (FD) group, 42.6%. The multiple telescopic stents group had only 7.1% with a 5-point score, while the intrasaccular flow disruption group had 55.6%, and the FD+ coil group had 40.7%. There were two cases of distal aneurysms: one A3 segment aneurysm scored 5 points on silent MRA while the other M3 segment aneurysm did not visualize the aneurysm artery. A ≥3 score was helpful for diagnosing postoperative recurrence, with rates of 100%, 97.8%, 87.9%, 57.1%, 88.9%, 85.2%, and 50% across the groups.ConclusionsSilent MRA shows significant potential for postoperative follow-up in endovascular therapy of aneurysms, particularly in interventions of coiling embolization, stent-assisted coiling, and FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.