Trial reportCancer immunology research2025
Sintilimab plus Anlotinib in Patients with Pretreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Cancer immunology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- IMMUNOSARC II Master Trial: Phase II Study of Sunitinib and Nivolumab in Clear Cell Sarcoma Cohort.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Combination Therapy With Sintilimab and Anlotinib for Advanced Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with improved progression-free survival in locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced sarcomas have limited treatment options after standard therapy, and therefore we investigated the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus anlotinib in this setting. Patients age 18 to 75 years with advanced sarcomas and prior systemic therapy were enrolled. Patients with untreated, primary chemotherapy-resistant tumor types, such as alveolar soft-part sarcoma and clear-cell sarcoma, were also included. Patients received sintilimab 200 mg (day 1) and anlotinib (8, 10, or 12 mg investigator-chosen, day 1-14) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AE). The predictive value of tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) was explored. A total of 42 patients were enrolled, and 40 (95.2%) patients were non-alveolar soft-part sarcoma. The ORR and DCR were 30.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.4%-45.5%] and 76.2% (95% CI, 62.8%-89.6%), respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 15.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-10.2). The median OS was not reached. The most common AEs included elevated lactate dehydrogenase (28.57%), hypoproteinemia (21.43%), and increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (21.43%). The most common ≥ grade 3 AEs were hypertension (4.76%) and hyponatremia (4.76%). Two serious AEs (one hepatitis and one intestinal perforation) were recorded. The ORR in TLS-positive patients (n = 7) was significantly higher than that in TLS-negative patients (n = 28; 71.4% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.033). Therefore, sintilimab plus anlotinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in advanced sarcomas, particularly among TLS-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.