ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
A Unified Hybrid Model for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: Merging Statistical, Kernel-Based and Neural Approaches.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public health risk stratification using hybrid machine learning: a reproducible analysis of performance, stability, and risk attribution.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A Unified Hybrid Model for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: Merging Statistical, Kernel-Based and Neural Approaches.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are still the leading cause of death in the worldwide. Traditional machine learning models often have difficulty in determine how to capture the complex links between disease risk factors and disease occurrence. This article discusses a hybrid machine learning approach for cardiovascular risk prediction (HMLCRP) to address this problem. This approach combines logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVMs) and neural networks (NNs) to make predictions more correct and reliable. The proposed model looks at important coronary heart sickness risk factors, including excessive blood pressure, a record of coronary heart disorder within the family, pressure, age, sex, levels of cholesterol, body mass index (BMI) and poor dwelling choices. The hybrid technique makes use of the nice functions of LR for clean understanding, SVM for dealing with large amounts of facts and NNs for finding developments. By integrating these models together, the HMLCRP makes positive that type is correct and that danger predictions are accurate. In this study, benchmark datasets used, which include the cardio statistics set, heart ailment dataset and Framingham heart examination dataset, are used to train and test the version. Popular parameter measures, such as accuracy, precision, recall and the F1-score, are used to determine overall performance. The results of the experiments indicate that the HMLCRP is better at predicting effects than individual models. The suggested combination model is a major step forward in personalised healthcare because it allows proactive risk management and early intervention methods to stop CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.