ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
Impact of Social Determinants on Melanoma Outcomes in Canada: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSocioeconomic status (SES) and distance to nearest hospital are known social determinants impacting melanoma survival; however, few studies have investigated the effect in a universal healthcare setting, like Canada. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study at The Ottawa Hospital (1999-2023) investigated SES and distance lived from the hospital on overall survival, recurrence time, and stage at presentation in melanoma surgical patients. Income quintiles (InQs) were determined using postal codes linked to 2016 census data, and logistic regressions were conducted for the highest and lowest InQs.
resultsOf 959 patients, 277 were in the highest InQ group (mean age: 64; 57% males) and 114 were in the lowest (mean age: 60; 48% males). Higher InQ was significantly associated with lower odds of stage II-IV disease at presentation (p = 0.004, odds ratio: 0.865, 95% CI 0.784 to 0.954), but not with overall survival, recurrence time, or stage III-IV disease. Distance had no significant impact on outcomes. Female sex was protective against recurrence time (p = 0.020, hazard ratio: 0.705), stage II-IV (p = 0.049, odds ratio: 0.766, 95% CI: 0.587, 0.999), and III-IV (p = 0.009, odds ratio: 0.670, 95% CI: 0.496, 0.904) disease.
conclusionHigher SES reduced stage II-IV risk without affecting survival, stage III-IV risk, or recurrence time. Distance to nearest hospital had no significant effect. Females had longer time to recurrence and lower odds of advanced disease. Future research should explore potential educational and primary care barriers that may contribute to advanced stages in lower InQ populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.