ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Co-Design of a Weekly Meal Box for Neurological Conditions: Findings From Consumer and Healthcare Provider Collaborative Workshops.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Design of a Weekly Meal Box for Neurological Conditions: Findings From Consumer and Healthcare Provider Collaborative Workshops.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study explores the collaborative co-design process for developing a weekly meal box tailored for individuals with neurological conditions. Recognising the critical role of nutrition for this community, the research addresses the challenges posed by cognitive and physical impairments in meal preparation.
methodsThrough two co-design workshops involving consumers, healthcare providers and industry experts, insights were gathered on dietary preferences, nutritional needs and practical challenges.
resultsThe workshops emphasised the importance of convenient, easy-to-prepare meals with simple instructions, flexibility and customisability. Consumers expressed preferences for convenient, easy-to-prepare meals with simple, easy-to-follow recipe instructions that align with optimal dietary patterns and taste preferences. Health and industry experts emphasised the importance of flexibility/customisability, ease of access and meal preparation. A prototype meal box was developed and tested in a simulation event, revealing positive feedback and areas for improvement. Participants appreciated the pre-prepared ingredients and reported increased confidence in cooking.
conclusionBy involving both consumers and health and industry experts in the design process, this study contributes to the design of meal box solutions that have real potential to improve the quality of life for those managing neurological conditions through nutrition. The co-design approach ensured the meal box met the specific needs of the target group, promoting sustainability and practical application. Future research will focus on refining the prototype and evaluating its effectiveness in a broader pilot study. This study underscores the importance of user-centred design in creating viable nutritional solutions for individuals with neurological impairments. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with lived experience of a neurological condition, their carers, health providers and industry experts contributed throughout the design process and the preliminary simulation event. Our thematic analysis was conducted by someone with lived experience of a neurological condition, who also contributed to the writing and reviewing of the manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.