ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
Automated assessment of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients with fusion of multichannel surface electromyography features.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate a more accurate and efficient technique for assessing spasticity in stroke patients via surface electromyography (sEMG).
methods45 hemiplegic individuals were recruited and spasticity was assessed via the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Multichannel sEMG data were collected from 3 muscles: the long head of the biceps brachii (LB), the short head of the biceps brachii (SB), and the brachioradialis (BR). Both time-domain and frequency-domain features were extracted. A K-nearest neighbour (k-NN) classifier was used to develop a new feature vector consisting of multichannel sEMG features. Finally, a model using this new feature was constructed and evaluated for classification accuracy.
resultsData from 40 patients were analysed, revealing significant correlations between MAS scores and sEMG features. Specifically, MAS exhibited strong positive correlations with 3 time-domain features: root mean square (RMS), integral sEMG (iEMG), and envelope area (EA) (r > 0.7). In contrast, frequency-domain features were negatively correlated with the MAS score (r < -0.7). A single-channel model and a single-feature model were developed as baselines. A k-NN classifier using a novel feature vector - -integrating single-channel and single-feature data - enabled automatic spasticity grading, surpassing the performance of the baseline models. The proposed multichannel sEMG feature fusion model achieved an average accuracy of 78.7%, significantly outperforming both the single-channel model (LB: 66.0%, SB: 64.3%, BR: 70.4%) and the single-feature model (RMS 70.8%, iEMG 71.4%, and EA 63.4%).
conclusionsCompared with single-channel and single-feature models, the k-NN model, which uses multichannel sEMG features, has superior accuracy in spasticity assessments and is a reliable tool for objective evaluation. This approach holds promise for enhancing rehabilitation strategies by enabling precise and data-driven efficacy assessments, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.