ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2026
Joint analysis of dispersed count-time data using a bivariate latent factor model.
Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Joint analysis of dispersed count-time data using a bivariate latent factor model.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we explore parameter estimation for a joint count-time data model with a two-factor latent trait structure, representing accuracy and speed. Each count-time variable pair corresponds to a specific item on a measurement instrument, where each item consists of a fixed number of tasks. The count variable represents the number of successfully completed tasks and is modeled using a Beta-binomial distribution to account for potential over-dispersion. The time variable, representing the duration needed to complete the tasks, is modeled using a normal distribution on a logarithmic scale. To characterize the model structure, we derive marginal moments that inform a set of method-of-moments (MOM) estimators, which serve as initial values for maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) via the Monte Carlo Expectation-Maximization (MCEM) algorithm. Standard errors are estimated using both the observed information matrix and bootstrap resampling, with simulation results indicating superior performance of the bootstrap, especially near boundary values of the dispersion parameter. A comprehensive simulation study investigates estimator accuracy and computational efficiency. To demonstrate the methodology, we analyze oral reading fluency (ORF) data, showing substantial variation in item-level dispersion and providing evidence for the improved model fit of the Beta-binomial specification, assessed using standardized root mean square residuals (SRMSR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.