ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nurse Perspectives on Prone Positioning for ARDS Patient in the ICU: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of Facilitator and Barrier.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prone positioning is an established therapeutic intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, its utilization in ARDS treatment remains low, despite recommendations and evidence of its benefits. Objective: This study aims to explore the phenomenon of performing prone position for ARDS patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially from the nurses' perspective of the facilitators and the barrier. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed. Fifteen ICU nurses from a referral hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, who had performed at least 10 prone positions on intubated patients, were interviewed. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify emerging themes. Results: The facilitator factors are the availability of specially designed tool, the knowledge about benefit for the patient, and the availability of plan to mitigate complication. The barrier factors are the heavy maneuver during the process, the needs of lots of manpower, and the agitating patient. The facilitators lead the nurse to following way, the availability of specialized design tools enhances nurse confidence and patient safety. Then, the knowledge related to prone positioning benefit reinforced prone position importance. Additionally, a planning and proactive measures are necessary since the prone positioning is posed risk. The barrier holds the nurse performance in the following way: the physical demand may lead to musculoskeletal problems, such as back pain; inadequate staffing results in procedure delays or cancellations. Patient agitation, especially in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients, posed additional challenges, including the risk of extubating and increased congestion. Conclusion: ICU setting needs to be supportive to promote safe and effective prone positioning practices. This can be achieved through addressing the facilitator and the barrier of prone position. Additionally, prone positioning guideline development should involve the nurse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.