ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Smartphone-based activity research: methodology and key insights.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Objectively studying patient outcomes following surgery has been an important aspect of evidence-based medicine. The current gold-standard-patient reported outcomes measures-provides valuable information but have subjective biases. Smartphones, which passively collect data on physical activity such as daily steps, may provide objective and valuable insight into patient recovery and functional status. This study aims to provide a methodological guide for data collection and analysis of smartphone accelerometer data to assess clinical outcomes following surgery. Methods: Patient health metrics-namely daily steps, distance travelled, and flights climbed-were extracted from patient smartphones using easy-to-download applications. These applications upload the data that smartphone accelerometers passively collect daily to a HIPAA compliant encrypted server while de-identifying the patient's personal health information. Patients were consented in multiple settings-synchronously during clinical visits or asynchronously over the phone-and could be enrolled during the initial pre-operative visit or well after the surgery. With the patient data acquired, the peri-operative window of selection is determined based on the needs to the study. The timeseries data is then statistically normalized to account for individual baselines and smoothened over a 14-day moving average to minimize noise. Mathematical analysis can be harnessed to study quantifiable recovery and decline periods, which provide continuous and nuanced insight into patient's health throughout their spine disease and treatment course. Additionally, integrating clinical variables permits computational machine models capable of predicting patient trajectories and guiding clinical decisioning. Conclusion: Smartphones offer a new metric for studying patient well-being and outcomes after surgery. The research with them is in its nascent stages but further studies can potentially revolutionize our understanding of spinal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.