ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Deep learning radiomics nomogram predicts lymph node metastasis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for risk stratification in head and neck cancer: a scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: state of the art.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastases (LNM) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) has been associated with lower survival, but current imaging methods, such as computed tomography (CT), have limited capabilities to identify them. Both conventional radiomics, involving data analysis of high-throughput quantitative features extracted from medical images, as well as deep learning networks, improved LNM diagnostic accuracy in LSCC, but the combination of both approaches has not been fully examined. In this study, we aimed to improve LNM identification in LSCC patients by developing a predictive nomogram, combining deep learning radiomics and clinical imaging features from CT images. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 235 LSCC patients, divided into training (164) and validation (71) sets, was conducted. Radiomics features were extracted from CT images, and 7 machine learning algorithms were used to develop 7 radiomics models, which were combined with deep learning features extracted from the ResNet50 deep learning network to form deep learning radiomics (DLR) models. The optimal DLR model was combined with significant clinical imaging features from CT scans to develop the predictive nomogram for LNM in LSCC. Results: The nomogram, under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, yielded areas under the curve (AUC) values of, respectively, 0.934 and 0.864 for training and validation sets, significantly higher than clinical imaging features (0.832 and 0.817), conventional radiomics (0.861 and 0.818), and DLR (0.913 and 0.864), indicating that it was significantly more accurate in predicting LNM in LSCC patients. Additionally, decision curve analysis found that the nomogram had significantly higher clinical utility than the other 3 models. Conclusion: The predictive nomogram, combining clinical imaging and DLR features, is able to accurately identify LNM in LSCC patients, providing valuable information for non-invasive LN staging and personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.