ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier HIV Diagnosis in a Routine Opt-out Testing Environment in Atlanta.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis in Mexico City: unveiling the sex gap.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Routine, opt-out HIV testing strategies aim to diagnose HIV earlier and decrease ongoing transmission. We report missed opportunities (MO) and missed testing opportunities (MTO) for earlier HIV diagnosis in a safety-net healthcare system using routine opt-out testing. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed adults diagnosed with HIV between 2015 and 2022 with eligible encounters 30-365 days before diagnosis. MO is defined as no HIV testing in the year before diagnosis. MTOs are encounters where testing was indicated but not performed. Logistic regression identified factors associated with MO and MTO. To evaluate the opt-out testing program, we measured the number of individuals eligible for testing, tests completed, reactive results, and new HIV diagnoses. Results: Of 713 newly diagnosed individuals, 499 (70%) had MO. Among 1845 encounters, 1235 (67%) were MTO. Sexual health-related encounters and STI testing had lower MO odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.90; Conclusions: Despite routine opt-out HIV testing, most individuals newly diagnosed with HIV had no testing in the prior year, highlighting the need to optimize opt-out testing procedures, particularly in primary care and nonsexual health visits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.