SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine nursing in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Some clinical studies have suggested that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nursing techniques may promote better recovery in stroke patients compared to conventional neurological nursing. However, high-quality evidence-based research is still lacking. This study selected two outcome indicators-motor function and activities of daily living (ADL)-to systematically evaluate the efficacy of TCM nursing techniques in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Methods: Seven major Chinese and English databases were systematically searched. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were used to evaluate motor function, while the Barthel Index (BI) was used to assess ADL. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study characteristics to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 18 studies involving 1,419 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with conventional care, the TCM nursing group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in FMA (SMD = 1.92, Conclusion: Compared to conventional care, TCM nursing techniques can significantly improve spasticity in stroke patients, and also provide some benefits for limb motor function and ADL. Given the high heterogeneity and poor GRADE assessment of FMA and BI, the above results should be interpreted with caution. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251006204.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.