ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Deep learning-based image reconstruction benefits diffusion tensor imaging for assessing severity of depression.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLR) improves the accuracy of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements used to assess the severity of depression. Methods: A total of 52 patients diagnosed with depression in our hospital between March 2023 and July 2023 were enrolled in this study. The severity of depression was measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Each patient underwent DTI scans. Two image sets were generated: one with the original DTI (ORI DTI) and one using DLR DTI. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) were used to compare the fractional anisotropy (FA) between DLR DTI and ORI DTI, as well as between patients with mild-to-moderate and those with severe depression. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to determine independent factors for discriminating mild-to-moderate from severe depression patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and areas under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the diagnostic performance. Results: Twenty-eight patients with mild-to-moderate depression and 24 with severe depression were included. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender ( Conclusion: DLR DTI demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting white matter (WM) abnormalities in patients with severe depression and provided better diagnostic performance in evaluating severity of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.